WhatsApp Chat Alone Cannot Prove ₹24.21 Crore On-Money: ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Addition     ACIT v. Ashokkumar Babulal Bambharoliya | ITA No. 1130/Ahd/2025 (Lead Case) | ITAT Ahmedabad Can a WhatsApp conversation found during a search on a third party who has no demonstrated connection with the assessee’s land transaction be enough to establish receipt…

Section 54: Does Joint Ownership With Wife Reduce Capital Gains Exemption by 50%?.   ITAT Mumbai | M/s. Mohd Amin Esmail Fazlani v. ITO | ITA No. 5578/Mum/2025 | AY 2013-14 Does purchasing a new house jointly in the names of a husband and wife automatically restrict the husband’s exemption under Section 54 to 50%?…

Section 74 Cannot Be Invoked by Merely Using the Words “Fraud” or “Suppression”: Supreme Court Lays Down Important Safeguards     Tata Steel Ltd. v. Union of India — Section 74 GST proceedings require foundational facts, not mere allegations Can the GST Department invoke the extended limitation period under Section 74 of the CGST Act…

Section 16(5): A Second Chance for Old GST Input Tax Credit Claims     GST | Input Tax Credit | Section 16(4) | Section 16(5) | FY 2017-18 to FY 2020-21 | Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 For years, one of the most persistent GST disputes concerned Input Tax Credit (ITC) denied merely because it…

Electricity Subsidy Taxable? Supreme Court Reiterates the “Purpose Test”     When a subsidy reduces the cost of running a business, it may be revenue – not capital A government subsidy can look like an incentive for industrial development, but its tax character does not depend merely on the broad objective mentioned in the government…