Recent Post by the taxtalk

80G Registration Denied Due to “Religious Objects”? ITAT Clarifies the Law Every Trust Must Know

80G Registration Denied Due to “Religious Objects”? ITAT Clarifies the Law Every Trust Must Know   One of the most common-and frustrating-reasons for rejection of Section 80G registration today is this: “Your trust deed contains religious objects, hence 80G cannot be granted.” This approach is not only widespread-it is also legally incorrect. A recent ITAT ruling…

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Levied for Mere Disallowance: ITAT Rajkot Clarifies the Law | Key Ruling in Pardes Dehydration Co HUF vs ITO

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Levied for Mere Disallowance: ITAT Rajkot Clarifies the Law | Key Ruling in Pardes Dehydration Co HUF vs ITO   Penalty notices under Section 271(1)(c) are often issued almost mechanically whenever an addition or disallowance is made in assessment. But a recent ITAT Rajkot ruling has once again reaffirmed a…

Old vs New Tax Regime (AY 2026-27): What You Actually Lose-and What You Still Keep

Old vs New Tax Regime (AY 2026-27): What You Actually Lose-and What You Still Keep   Every tax season, one confusion refuses to go away: “New tax regime means no deductions at all.” That’s not entirely correct-but it’s not completely wrong either. The truth lies somewhere in between. The new regime removes most deductions, but…

2913 Days Delay Condoned: Telangana High Court Puts Natural Justice Above Technicalities

2913 Days Delay Condoned: Telangana High Court Puts Natural Justice Above Technicalities   In a remarkable ruling that underscores the primacy of fairness in tax litigation, the Telangana High Court condoned an extraordinary delay of 2913 days (nearly 8 years) in filing an appeal before the ITAT. The decision in ITTA No. 21 of 2026 sends a…

Section 69A: ITAT Endorses a Balanced, Evidence-Based Approach over Blanket Additions

Section 69A: ITAT Endorses a Balanced, Evidence-Based Approach over Blanket Additions   Shrenik Manish Mehta vs ITO ITA No.: 7324/Mum/2025 Facts: 1.  The assessee, an individual, filed return declaring income of ₹6.30 lakh. Case was selected for scrutiny due to large cash payments towards credit card dues. 2.  Total credit card payment: ₹27.65 lakh, out…