B. Ravindran Pillai vs. CIT (2011) 332 ITR 531

Recent Posts

• ROC Bangalore imposed a penalty of Rs. 50 Lakh on Directors for Non – Disclosure of “Related Party Transactions” – Section 188 of the Companies Act – 2013
• An overview of issues while issuing intimation u/s 143(1) by CPC
• Date of Return filing extended but not the date of Tax Payment
• No penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) when Assessment Completed u/s 143(3)
• Set-Off of STT-Paid Losses Against 30% STCG is Allowed: ITAT Mumbai
• What you should do after income tax department has approached ITAT against favourable order of CIT (a)
• Can You Have Your Exemption and Carry Forward Losses Too? A 54F Story
• Southern Europe’s Banking Evolution: The Banco Novo Chapter
• BlackRock’s Transformation: Larry Fink’s Ambitious Roadmap to Innovation
• Source of source in respect of loans not required to be proved under section 68 of the ITA as it stood prior to 01.04.2023