Notice issued for prosecution under Black Money Act unconstitutional for defaults before 2015 i.e., when Black Money Act was enacted. Bombay High Court issues notice
Income Tax Survey does not empower the ITO to examine any person on oath and the statement recorded u/s 133A has no evidentiary value: ITAT Kolkata
Amount received from Sale of Software Products not Royalty as per Article 12(3) of India -USA DTAA: ITAT
Sec. 80P deduction can’t be denied to the assessee merely on reason that it didn’t file return of income: ITAT
Additions framed on account of alleged cash receipts not valid where no witnesses to such payments are available to testify & where based solely on a statement that some payments were made
Demand in pursuance of order of assessment cannot be pursued without disposing off the petition for stay of demand