If two views are possible and AO has adopted one view, CIT cannot presume that “it is prejudicial to the revenue”
If two views are possible and AO has adopted one view, CIT cannot presume that “it is prejudicial to the revenue”…
Two view in 263
Recent Posts
- Full Section 54 Exemption Allowed Even Without Capital Gain Scheme Deposit – ITAT Gives Relief to Home Sellers
- Bombay High Court Clarifies Limitation for TDS Default Orders
- Income Tax Dept acts against 62 restaurants in 46 cities, suppression of sales under scanner:
- ITAT ALLOWS DEDUCTION FOR DONATION TO POLITICAL PARTY, DISMISSES ACIT APPEAL FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE
- Owner Dies After Sale – Will New House Bought by Legal Heir Get Capital Gain Exemption?
- Clarification issued regarding certain email communications sent under the Advance Tax e-Campaign for AY 2026–27 (FY 2025–26)
- Revision u/s 264 – PCIT bound to follow ITAT Special Bench: Tax on Deemed STCG u/s 50 at LTCG rate u/s 112
- Updated Return 2.0: From Correction Tool to Compliance Settlement Framework
- ROC Bengaluru Imposes Penalty for Approving Share Transfer in Physical Form
- Budget 2026: No deduction of interest in case of dividend income
