Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT
Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days –…
Mukesh J. Ruparel v. ITO
Recent Posts
- Agricultural Income: A Comparative Analysis of the 1961 and 2025 Income-tax Acts:
- Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Income Tax Officer in ₹25 Lakh Bribery Case
- Widow entitled to TDS in the name of her late husband, after she had declared his income in her own tax returns (ITRs): ITAT
- The Finance Act, 2025, due to a drafting lapse, inadvertently reduced the standard deduction under the new tax regime from ₹75,000 to ₹50,000, for FY 25-26
- Lack of Enquiry vs. Inadequate Enquiry’ – ITAT Chennai Allows Appeal, Strikes Down 263 Order
- CBDT Amends Black Money Act Instructions to Exempt Minor Foreign Assets
- Mass Issuance of Income Tax Scrutiny Notices u/s 143(2) for AY 2024-25
- Capital Gain Indexation Begins From Date of Agreement, Not Possession
- Income Declared Under 44AD Cannot Be Taxed Again Under Section 68:
- Additional Ground Can Be Raised at Hearing-Even If Not Taken Before Lower Authorities or in Cross-Objection!
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT){kind=link}
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Slide3-11.jpg){kind=link}