IT JudgementSec. 14A couldn’t be invoked if no exempt income was earned during the year: SC dismissed SLP8 years ago– SLP dismissed against High Court ruling that section 14A cannot be invoked where no exempt income was earned by…
IT JudgementNotice issued in name of dead person is not enforceable in law8 years ago2018] 95 taxmann.com 155 (Madras) HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Alamelu Veerappan v. Income Tax Officer, Non-corporate Ward-2(2), Chennai* T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. WRIT…
IT JudgementXAVIER INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER8 years agoFacts of the case Charitable trust has income from training and consultancy.AO observed that income derived from training and consultancy…
IT JudgementMadras High Court on Writ Petition filed by directors challenging Arbitrary Strike Off & Director disqualification !!8 years agoMadras High Court delivered a judgement on Writ Petition filed by directors challenging Arbitrary Strike Off & Director disqualification. The…
IT JudgementInterest paid to Private Bank can’t be disallowed u/s 43B : ITAT8 years agoInterest paid to Private Bank can’t be disallowed u/s 43B: ITAT ITAT [button color=”” size=”” type=”round” target=”” link=”https://thetaxtalk.com/”]home[/button] [button color=””…
IT JudgementNo additon u/s 68 if assessee failed to produce persons who had applied as shareholders- SC dismissed SLP8 years agoNo additon u/s 68 if assessee failed to produce persons who had applied as shareholders- SC dismissed SLP IT: SLP…
IT JudgementForget Identity, Credit worthiness & Genuineness, Share premium is taxable as Income !! (Courtsey: Section 56(2)(viib))8 years agoForget Identity, Credit worthiness & Genuineness, Share premium is taxable as Income !! (Courtsey: Section 56(2)(viib)) Sunrise Academy of Medical…
IT JudgementOrder u/s154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 canno be done by AO on the basis of Audit Objection8 years agoITA No.328-A. K, Transport Agency vs. ITO ITA No.328-A. K, Transport Agency vs. ITO
IT JudgementIf basic documents of share allotment filed, AO cannot make additions on the ground of “Identity & credit worthiness”8 years agoPCIT vs. Acquatic Remedies Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court) S. 68 Bogus share capital: If copies of the share application…
IT JudgementReturn is filed u/s153A(1)(a) of the Act sha be deemed to have been filed u/s 139 (1) of the Act for the benefit u/s 139(3)8 years agoImportant decision of hon’ble Cal HC When search operations are conducted under Section 132 of the Act, the obligation of…
IT JudgementPenny Stock judgement by Jaipur Tribunal in Pramod Kumar Lodha Vs. ITO, Jaipur.8 years agoPenny Stock judgement by Jaipur Tribunal in Pramod Kumar Lodha Vs. ITO, Jaipur. [button color=”” size=”” type=”square” target=”” link=”https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxR9OWNe1BQOOUZSR2dwRDlYdk8yNzlHUjhzc0dOakpsdTJj/view?usp=sharing”]download[/button]
IT JudgementAO should be clear whether its “inaccurate furnishing or “concealment for levying Penalty: ITAT8 years agoHPCL Mittal Energy Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Amritsar) (Third Member) S. 271(1)(c)/ 292B: The AO cannot initiate penalty on the…
IT JudgementAppeal under IT Act, 1961 does not mean mere filing of the ‘memorandum of appeal’8 years agoAppeal under IT Act, 1961 does not mean mere filing of the ‘memorandum of appeal CASE BRIEFSTRIBUNALS/COMMISSIONS/REGULATORY BODIES Published on…
IT JudgementNO COST – NO CAPITAL GAIN8 years agoNO COST – NO CAPITAL GAIN Sec. 45 charges the profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital…
IT JudgementApplication filed by charitable trust u/s 12A merits deemed registration, once Revenue Authority has not acted upon such application within six months of its receipt: HC8 years agoApplication filed by charitable trust u/s 12A merits deemed registration, once Revenue Authority has not acted upon such application within…
IT JudgementFormal deed of trust was not necessary for the grant of registration u/s 12A/12AA of the Act: HC8 years agoThe Court concurs with the ITAT that a formal deed of trust was not necessary for the grant of registration…
IT JudgementVery important Conclusion by Apex Court decision( 5 members constitutional bench) in Dilip Kumar & Co8 years ago
IT JudgementWonderful Judgement – For section 54F exemption, section 50C can be ignored: Jaipur ITAT8 years agoITO vs. Raj Kumar Parashar (ITAT Jaipur) S. 50C/ 54F: If the assessee has invested the entire sale consideration in…