If two views are possible and AO has adopted one view, CIT cannot presume that “it is prejudicial to the revenue”
If two views are possible and AO has adopted one view, CIT cannot presume that “it is prejudicial to the revenue”…
Two view in 263
Recent Posts
- When “Irrevocable” Becomes a New Roadblock for charitable trust: An Unnecessary Hurdle for Charitable Trusts
- Delay in Filing Form 10B is Procedural – Substantive Exemption under Section 11 Cannot Be Denied on Technical Grounds
- Survey Statement u/s 133A Has No Evidentiary Value – Additions Quashed
- Income has escaped assessment is a pre-condition for re-opening the assessment and not a borrowed satisfaction from outside source
- Section 119(2)(b) Condonation of Delay: Who Has the Power to Grant Relief for Refunds and Section 80P Claims?
- Loans repaid in the subsequent assessment years – No addition u/s 68 can be made: ITAT Gauhati
- Section 269SS Not Attracted to One-Time Cash Sale Consideration: ITAT Chandigarh Clarifies the Law
- Tax Refund Delays: Not Always CPC’s Fault, Not Always Yours Either
- ITC Denial to Bona Fide Purchaser Solely Due to Retrospective Cancellation of Seller’s GST Registration – Supreme Court Issues Notice
- All orders in ‘E-Proceedings’ must be signed digitally: Manually signed Assessment Order held invalid by ITAT
