The time limit of reckoning for section 54 is to be read as 139(4) and not as 139(1) as section 139(4) is also a sub-set of section 139(1).
1 Comment
The time limit of reckoning for section 54 is to be read as 139(4) and not as 139(1) as section…
section 54 & late deposit
Recent Posts
- An addition of ₹ 10.33 Cr as commission income in the hands of the Auto Rickshaw Driver – ITAT Deleted addition with direction that the real culprits should be investigated
- Allotment date & not registration date is relevant for determining the holding period for capital Assets as Long-Term or Short-Term
- When Luxury Meets Tax: CBDT’s New TCS Rules for Watches, Home Theatres — and Even Horses!
- Rejection of Books of Accounts: The profit estimation cannot be arbitrary or without any basis.
- CBDT Circular 05/2025 for Waiver of Interest levy in specified cases
- Compensation received for removing the nuisance should be treated as a capital receipt and hence not taxable: ITAT Mumbai
- Unaccounted amount of Rs 103 cr credited to the account of a rickshaw driver: ITAT deleted the addition
- Whether retraction of statement, without discrediting corroborative evidence, is insufficient to nullify additions under Sections 69A and 69C?
- GST: No adverse inference can be drawn against the purchasing dealer merely because the supplier’s registration was cancelled later
- Interest received in respect of delayed payment of compensation to be treated as accruals to the principal compensation amount
 and not as 139(1) as section 139(4) is also a sub-set of section 139(1).){kind=link}
 and not as 139(1) as section 139(4) is also a sub-set of section 139(1).&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Untitled-816-min.png){kind=link}