Penny Stock: No incriminating evidence No Addition – ITAT Mumbai
0
Penny Stock: No incriminating evidence No Addition – ITAT Mumbai This is the landmark order by the ITAT Mumbai which…
CIT vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation
Recent Posts
- Rejection of Books of Accounts: The profit estimation cannot be arbitrary or without any basis.
- CBDT Circular 05/2025 for Waiver of Interest levy in specified cases
- Compensation received for removing the nuisance should be treated as a capital receipt and hence not taxable: ITAT Mumbai
- Unaccounted amount of Rs 103 cr credited to the account of a rickshaw driver: ITAT deleted the addition
- Whether retraction of statement, without discrediting corroborative evidence, is insufficient to nullify additions under Sections 69A and 69C?
- GST: No adverse inference can be drawn against the purchasing dealer merely because the supplier’s registration was cancelled later
- Interest received in respect of delayed payment of compensation to be treated as accruals to the principal compensation amount
- Scheme of Section 144B only requires service of a draft assessment order along with the SCN in case of eligible Assessee
- Mutual Fund Gains of Singapore Resident Not Taxable in India under DTAA: ITAT Mumbai
- Transfer of Depreciable Assets: Tax rate prescribed U/s 112 is applicable even if it is deemed to be taxed as short-term capital gains U/s 50.
