Delay in issue of Refund- Why interest should not be recovered erring Officer? – Bombay High Court
0
Delay in issue of Refund- Why interest should not be recovered erring Officer? – Bombay High Court In a landmark…
Bombay High Court Tata Projects Limited Vs DCIT
Recent Posts
- Assessment order passed on a non-existent entity due to amalgamation is invalid considering the applicability of Section 170(2) of the Income Tax Act
- Non filing of MSME-1 by Companies may attract penalty up to Rs. 3 Lakh
- Courts, Sub-Registrars must report if they come across cash transactions over Rs. 2 Lakhs to Income Tax Department: Supreme Court
- No notice u/s 143(2) issued by the AO – ITAT Quashed Assessment as Jurisdiction
- Reasons recorded were vague and scanty and the approval has been granted mechanically – ITAT quashed the Reassessment Assessment
- Tax demands due to non-reflection of the ITC in GSTR 2A/GSTR 2B despite paying the same to the seller – Landmark order by High Court
- Unsigned notices are void ab initio and cannot confer jurisdiction or attract any legal consequence
- AO must independently form a reasoned belief while initiating proceedings u/s 147: Bombay HC
- Unsecured loans from trustees without prior approval from the Charity Commissioner: ITAT directed CIT (E) for giving Permanent Registration
- Private Discretionary Trust: Surcharge is applicable at respective surcharge slab rate: SB- Mumbai ITAT
