Date of signing the joint Development agreement is not fully relevant for determining the Capital Gain Tax liability !!
CIT vs. Dr. Arvind S. Phake (Bombay High Court) Section 2(47)(v): Immovable property is regard to have been transferr on…
2(47)(v)
Recent Posts
- Full Section 54 Exemption Allowed Even Without Capital Gain Scheme Deposit – ITAT Gives Relief to Home Sellers
- Bombay High Court Clarifies Limitation for TDS Default Orders
- Income Tax Dept acts against 62 restaurants in 46 cities, suppression of sales under scanner:
- ITAT ALLOWS DEDUCTION FOR DONATION TO POLITICAL PARTY, DISMISSES ACIT APPEAL FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE
- Owner Dies After Sale – Will New House Bought by Legal Heir Get Capital Gain Exemption?
- Clarification issued regarding certain email communications sent under the Advance Tax e-Campaign for AY 2026–27 (FY 2025–26)
- Revision u/s 264 – PCIT bound to follow ITAT Special Bench: Tax on Deemed STCG u/s 50 at LTCG rate u/s 112
- Updated Return 2.0: From Correction Tool to Compliance Settlement Framework
- ROC Bengaluru Imposes Penalty for Approving Share Transfer in Physical Form
- Budget 2026: No deduction of interest in case of dividend income