In tax jurisprudence “intention” would be irrelevant. If therefore any action is done with contrary intention but comes within the mischief of a taxing statute, it would still apply.
Payment made on October 3, 2017 shall be deemed to be paid by due date for 3rd instalment under IDS: CBDT
Delhi HC held in favour of Assessee . Revision petition under Sec. 264 is maintainable against sec. 143(1) intimation
Notice u/s 143(2) issued prior to filing of ROI invalid, resulting in assessment order to be set aside
After Amnesty Scheme in State Taxes and Central Taxes under GST, An expected Amnesty Scheme in Income Tax.
Penalty can’t be levied for Lack of Evidence supporting HRA Claim If Assessee admitted Fault: ITAT Chennai
Interesting judgement : Delay in filing of tax audit report due to Virus in computer system – Whether penalty can de dropped ?