• Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax
    • Latest Update
      • Circular
      • IT Judgement
      • Notification
      • Press Release
    • Article
      • salary
      • House propery
      • Business/Profession
      • Capital Gain
      • Other Source Of Income
      • Assessment
      • Tax Planning
  • GST
    • GST Act 2016
      • CGST Acts
      • SGST Acts
      • IGST Acts
    • GST Rules 2016
      • CGST Rules
      • SGST Rules
      • IGST Rules
    • GST Articles
      • Time Of Supply
      • Place Of Supply
      • Other GST Article
    • GST Judgement
  • News & Articles
    • Company Law
    • Other News
      • News
      • DTAA
      • Head Of Income
      • Interesting Income Tax
      • Miscellaneous
  • CA/CS/CMA Firms
  • Login

Interest incurred on loans taken for acquiring controlling interest in company of same line, would be allowable expenditure under section 36(1)(iii)

3rd December 2019




Loading

Interest incurred on loans taken for acquiring controlling interest in company of same line, would be allowable expenditure under section 36(1)(iii)

[2019] 111 taxmann.com 269 (Bombay)
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai  v. Concentrix Services (I) (P.) Ltd.
M. S. SANKLECHA AND NITIN JAMDAR, JJ.
IT APPEAL NOS. 778 AND 867 OF 2017, SEPTEMBER  4, 2019
It is undisputed that the business of the assessee is of running of BPO and Call Centres. Nor is it disputed that Canadian company is also in the business of Information Technology Enabled Services, i.e., BPO and Call Centre. It was the business decision of the assessee to enhance/expand its activities and presence in the world market and for that purpose it had acquired controlling interest in the business of ‘MC’ which was in the same line of business as the assessee. To make the above investment for the purpose of its business, the loan was taken. Therefore, the interest expenditure incurred on loans taken for investment in acquiring controlling interest in a company which was in the same line of business as that of the assessee would be allowable expenditure under section 36(1)(iii). Where an assessee claims deduction of interest paid on capital borrowed, all that an assessee has to show is that the borrowed funds were used for business purpose and if so then interest will have to be allowed as a deduction. The submission on behalf of the revenue that the assessee is in the business of BPO and Call Centre activities and not in the business of investment means that the prime business of the assessee is of running BPO and Call Centres and as recorded by the Tribunal the entire funds were borrowed so as to expand the business activities of BPO and Call Centres in Canada by acquiring a Canadian company. Thus, the loan was taken for the purpose of business. This is a finding of fact which has not been shown to be perverse. The expansion of one’s activities in Canada would require acquisition of a company by purchasing shares therein so as to expand the assessee’s business. The object of the expenditure clearly is for the purpose of the business and, therefore, the interest incurred on the funds borrowed for investment in MC Canada has to be allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii). So far as the finance expenditure is concerned, it would follow the allowing of interest expenditure. This expenditure is incurred in respect of the above loan taken for purpose of business and allowable under section 36(1)(iii).

 




3rd December 2019

This is an online news portal for tax news, updates, articles, judgments, Circulars, Notification and orders with regards to Indian Taxation Laws. ‘Simplifying the TAX & creating awareness about tax laws is the main motto of the Team theTAXTALK.

Recent Posts

  • If the tax effect as per the computation form provided by AO is below Rs. 60 lakhs, the appeal is liable to be dismissed on the ground of low tax effect: Delhi ITAT
  • No proposal to levy GST on UPI Transactions over ₹ 2,000 Government Clarfiied
  • Hyderabad ITAT deleted demonetization cash deposit addition as no concrete basis existed for treating the higher sales in that month as fictitious
  • Documents signed by 3rd party cannot be held to be colorable devise without verification.
  • CBIC issued Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for GST Registrations

Sign Up to New letter

Subscribe to our newsletter and get the latest updates

Menu