Section 69 Addition Cannot Be Based on Mere Suspicion or ‘Human Probabilities’ Once the Source of Cash Is Proved: ITAT Chennai
Section 69 Addition Cannot Be Based on Mere Suspicion or ‘Human Probabilities’ Once the Source of Cash Is Proved: ITAT…
suspicion cannot replace evidence
Recent Posts
- Income Tax Demand Recovery: Can the AO Attach Your Bank Account While Your Appeal Is Pending?
- Updated ITR: Can CPC Charge Section 234B Interest Beyond the Date of Tax Payment?
- Section 69C Cannot Apply When Source of Payment Is Known
- ₹11.22 Crore Addition and 500 Trees: An Unusual Second Chance by ITAT Chandigarh
- Interest on Land Acquisition Compensation: Can It Be Taxed Separately?
- Section 80GGC: A Bank Payment Is Not Always Enough-But a General Allegation Is Not Enough Either
- New Income-tax Act, 2025: Can JCIT(A) Set Aside an Assessment? A Small Drafting Change May Create a Big Litigation Issue
- CIT(A) Cannot Tell AO to Reopen Another Assessment Year
- DVO Valuation and 10% Tolerance Band: Can the Income Tax Department Tax a Difference in Property Value after DVO report?
- Section 87A Rebate on STCG under Section 111A – Ready-to-Use Application before the Assessing Officer
