Supreme Court recalled the suo-moto order

Recent Posts

• Calcutta High Court Grants Relief: 7-Day Delay Cannot Defeat Carry Forward of Losses
• Unexplained Credit Relief? The Finance Act 2026 Gives with One Hand — Takes Away with the Other
• I-T Department’s Mega Litigation Cleanup Drive: Relief for Taxpayers or Pressure Tactics?
• Stay of Demand under the Income Tax Act: Why Even 20% Payment Is Not Mandatory in Genuine Cases
• Paying Tax May Be Better Than Saving Tax
• Bogus Purchase of Capital Assets? ITAT Delhi Deletes Addition-Investigation Wing Info Alone Not Enough
• Rule 46A Relief: ITAT Mumbai Allows Additional Evidence Missed Due to SPAM Email | AIF Exemption Case Explained
• Penny Stock Additions Deleted: ITAT Hyderabad Rules “No Evidence, No Tax” | Key Relief for Capital Gains Cases
• Can a Charitable Trust File Form 121 If Income Is Below ₹3 Lakh? A Grey Area in TDS Law That Needs Clarity
• 103 CAs penalised. 85 debarred. Penalties up to ₹10 crore. A strong and consistent message to audit profession from NFRA since 2022.