Non-production of parties could not give credence to the bogus nature of purchases.
0
Non-production of parties could not give credence to the bogus nature of purchases. Delhi ITAT ACIT v. GTM Builders & Promoters…
section 69C and bogus purchase
Recent Posts
- Un-utilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) remaining after payment of all tax, interest, and penalties must be refunded to the taxpayer upon closure of business: Sikkim High Court
- Penalty U/s 122 of the CGST Act can be imposed even if no tax is ultimately found due under Section 74?
- Receipts from outside India are outside the scope of Section 5(2) and do not fall within the ambit of Section 68 or 69A.
- Section 56(2)(x) talks about immoveable property and so Purchase of Rural agricultural land below its stamp duty valuation is taxable
- Property Planning at 70: A Will, A Co-owner, or A Tax Tangle?
- TDS: Section-wise Short Summary for the FY 2025-26
- Compliance Calendar for July’2025
- One-Time ESOP Compensation: Capital Receipt or Taxable Perquisite?
- Compensation received for unlawful possession of immovable property constitutes a capital receipt and is not subject to income tax.
- Depreciation of amalgamating company shall not be disallowed for non filing of Form 62: Mumbai ITAT
