“Section 148 controversy likely to be decided in favour of the Revenue”
9 Comments
“Section 148 controversy likely to be decided in favour of the Revenue” Section 148 controversy appears to have been finally…
Section 148A Supreme court
Recent Posts
- Notice issued with a delay of 2 Minutes: Reassessment Proceeding quashed by Delhi HC
- Voluntary disclosure of income does not absolve the assessee from penalties under Section 271(1)(c) and 271AAB: Pune ITAT.
- Benami Transactions: Demonetized currency retained monetary value for conversion within prescribed timelines and so it is “property” under the BPTA
- Section 249(4)(b) should not be rigidly when no ITR is filed & where the entire income assessed is disputed: ITAT Agra
- Whether negative blocking of credit ledger is allowed via the CGST Act, 2017?
- Two distinct flats situated on separate floors and lacking structural or functional integration could not be treated as one residential unit: Delhi HC.
- Key CGST Rules regarding ITC reversal and apportionment – Rule 37, 39, 42 & 43.
- GST & MSME Compliance: A short overview of the Common Mistakes
- Some important issues in Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme:
- If the assessee has not disclosed details of a foreign bank account & does not provide other details on requested by AO, the Department is justified in making the Estimate: Delhi HC
