Validity of penalty if AO had initiated proceedings on one footing and concluded on other footing
Validity of penalty if AO had initiated proceedings on one footing and concluded on other footing Short Overview AO initiated…
R.S. Tradelink (P). Ltd. v. ACIT
Recent Posts
- ITAT Mumbai: Business Expenditure Cannot Be Disallowed Merely on Suspicion, Assumptions, or Surmises
- ITAT Chandigarh Grants Major Relief Under Section 54: Old Construction Cost Cannot Be Rejected Merely for Lack of Old Bills
- Has the Supreme Court Quietly Diluted the “Change of Opinion” Doctrine? A Critical Look at Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. JCIT
- Penalty Under Section 270A Invalid if AO Fails to Specify Exact Charge: Important ITAT Bangalore Ruling
- Substance Over Form: ITAT Mumbai Reaffirms Appellate Powers to Entertain New Claims Without Revised Return
- NRI Selling Property in India? Beware: TDS Rules Have Changed Under the New Income Tax Act, 2025
- ITAT Indore Drops Penalty Under Section 271AAC: “When Quantum Fails, Penalty Cannot Survive”
- How AI Is Quietly Changing Income Tax Assessments
- AO Cannot Travel Beyond Limited Scrutiny Scope Without Approval: Tribunal Quashes Addition
- Section 153C Proceedings Invalid if Satisfaction Note Recorded After 01.04.2021: Important Tribunal Ruling
