AAR must reply to the specific question raised before them: Bombay HC
AAR must reply to the specific question raised before them: Bombay HC Short summary of the case of Bombay…
provisions of section 23
Recent Posts
- Draft Income-tax Rules, 2026: Salary Taxation Finally Gets an Inflation Reality Check
- Section 13(2)(e) Not Same as Deemed Dividend Law: ITAT Delhi Clarifies Rules for Trust Investments in Group Companies
- Notice to Deceased Person Void, Section 150(1) Cannot Revive Time-Barred Reassessment: Chhattisgarh High Court Clarifies Law
- More Time to Correct, But at a Cost: The New Updated and Revised Return Rules
- Assessment Void if 143(2) Notice Issued by Wrong AO: ITAT Mumbai Quashes Order in Vinod Ramnath Rao Case
- ITAT Rajkot Takes Practical View in Section 80GGC Case: Full Disallowance Dropped, Addition Restricted to 10%
- Reassessment in Name of Deceased Person Is Void Even If Death Not Intimated: ITAT Mumbai Quashes Entire Proceedings
- ₹ 70,000 Crore on the Plate: From Biryani Bills to Big Data in India’s Tax Crackdown
- Does Department Appeal Before ITAT Extend Assessment Time Limit? A Crucial Point Taxpayers Must Know
- Assessment Invalid if Material Not Shared or Cross-Examination Denied: ITAT Mumbai Reaffirms Natural Justice Rule
