Penalty u/s 271AAB

Recent Posts

• Stock in trade cannot be subject matter of addition u/s 56(2)(viia) as it is outside the meaning of the word ‘property’ as provided in clause (vii) : Mumbai ITAT 
• CIT(A) is duty bound to follow his predecessors order on similar issue decided in another case: Mumbai ITAT
• PMLA accused has a right to get copies of material not even relied on by ED: SC
• No addition on ESI PF issue permissible under section 143(1) prior to Checkmate Judgement: Chhattisgarh HC
• Once the business receipts are accepted, no separate addition under Section 68 survives: ITAT Mumbai.
• Notice issued without complying with the CBDT instruction specifying the format for such notices is invalid
• ITAT Cancels Reopening for AY 2015–16 as Income Was Below ₹50 Lakh and Notice Issued Beyond 3-Year Limit
• The approval U/s 153D must reflect material, findings and reasoning to show that the higher authority has applied his mind before granting approval: Mumbai ITAT.
• An apt representation on the arbitrary and mechanical invocation of Section 74 of the CGST Act by GST Audit Commissionerates and DGGI
• CIT(A) has the power and discretion to accept the revised figures during appellate proceedings