Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty
Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty Delhi High…
Penalty 270A(9)
Recent Posts
- AI Basee unverified Submission – Bombay High court imposes costs – A wake-up call for professionals
- The Dangerous Habit of Ignoring Income Tax Emails and SMS – And How It Quietly Backfires
- Capital Gain Exemption under Section 54 Available Even When New House Is Purchased with Housing Loan – ITAT Kolkata in Amit Parekh Case
- When “Irrevocable” Becomes a New Roadblock for charitable trust: An Unnecessary Hurdle for Charitable Trusts
- Delay in Filing Form 10B is Procedural – Substantive Exemption under Section 11 Cannot Be Denied on Technical Grounds
- Survey Statement u/s 133A Has No Evidentiary Value – Additions Quashed
- Income has escaped assessment is a pre-condition for re-opening the assessment and not a borrowed satisfaction from outside source
- Section 119(2)(b) Condonation of Delay: Who Has the Power to Grant Relief for Refunds and Section 80P Claims?
- Loans repaid in the subsequent assessment years – No addition u/s 68 can be made: ITAT Gauhati
- Section 269SS Not Attracted to One-Time Cash Sale Consideration: ITAT Chandigarh Clarifies the Law
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty){kind=link}
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Presentation1-1.jpg){kind=link}