Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT
Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days –…
Panjos Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO
Recent Posts
- BSNL Ex-Gratia Scheme: ITAT Allows Full Exemption Despite 1400+ Days Delay – Big Relief for Taxpayers
- Ignoring binding precedent is not judicial independence-it is a mistake. ITAT can entertain Miscellaneous Application (MA) make rectification under Section 254(2)
- Mechanical Approval u/s 151 & Wrong Jurisdiction: Reassessment Held Invalid by ITAT Delhi
- Reassessment Cannot Become a Fishing Expedition: No Addition on Recorded Reason, No Valid Reopening
- Tax Changes from 1 April 2026: Big Relief for Salaried Employees & Senior Citizens | Allowances, HRA & New Forms Explained
- Startup Tax Holiday Gets a Big Boost: Eligibility Limit Raised to ₹300 Crore
- Section 68 & The Case of the Missing Directors: When Suspicion Took a Beating
- New Income Tax Act 2025 – Can the Department Access Your WhatsApp, Emails & Digital Life? (Part-2)
- Finance Bill 2026: Not Just Tweaks, But a Silent Tax Revolution
- CBDT Extends Due Date for TDS Certificates (Q3 FY 2025–26) to 31 March 2026
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT){kind=link}
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Slide3-11.jpg){kind=link}