Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT
Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days –…
Panjos Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO
Recent Posts
- Condonation of Delay under Section 119(2)(b) – CBDT Circular Cannot Override Substantive Right to Refund: HC
- Taxation of Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) in the Context of the New Income Tax Act, 2025:
- Madras High Court Quashes Reassessment as Time-Barred and Without Jurisdiction:
- How Nagpur’s Tax Drive Signals a Nationwide Shift in Transparency
- Understanding Tax Exemption and TDS Issues on Land Acquisition Compensation
- Regulatory Exposure of High-Net-Worth Families under the Black Money Law:
- MSME Lifeline – New Credit Scheme to Counter 50% US Tariffs
- Bombay High Court Rules Assessee Cannot Be Penalized for Chartered Accountant’s Belated Advice in Tax Filing
- How Every Citizen Became a Tax Collector
- TAX COMPLIANCE TRACKER – NOVEMBER, 2025
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT){kind=link}
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Slide3-11.jpg){kind=link}