Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT
Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days –…
Mukesh J. Ruparel v. ITO
Recent Posts
- Section 234C’s Hidden Cushion: The Lesser-Known 12% and 36% Advance Tax Rule
- Foreign Assets, Reassessment & Non-Residents: ITAT Special Bench Clarifies the 16-Year Rule
- Presumptive Taxation vs. Stamp Duty Valuation: ITAT Draws the Line Against Double Taxation
- Presumptive Taxation vs. Stamp Duty Valuation: ITAT Draws the Line Against Double Taxation
- No GST Expense Claimed? Then No Section 43B Disallowance, Rules ITAT
- Before You Click ‘Submit’… What Every Taxpayer Should Check in the ITR
- Can a Recorded Bank Loan Become ‘Unexplained Money’ Under Section 69A? Mumbai ITAT Says No
- A Wrong Section Should Not Deny the Right: Nagpur ITAT recognises Substance Over Technicalities
- No Old Bills? Still Eligible for Indexed Cost and Full Section 54 Exemption, Rules Chandigarh ITAT
- Wrong Route, Wrong Assessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Assessment Based on Third-Party Search Material
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT){kind=link}
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Slide3-11.jpg){kind=link}