Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT
0
Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days –…
Mukesh J. Ruparel v. ITO
Recent Posts
- Section 80P Deduction for Credit Co-operative Societies: Complete Legal Update
- Taxation of Mutual Funds in India [2025 Guide]
- Section 194T of Income Tax Act: New TDS Rule on Partner Payments Explained
- Reassessment, Unexplained Deposits & Section 148A: ITAT Ahmedabad Rules on Limitation & Justification
- Whether TDS U/S 194Q is required to be deducted for payment made for electricity?
- Capital Gains Already Taxed in AY 2004–05 — Section 50C Cannot Trigger Tax in AY 2007–08: Madras HC
- When ₹ 10 Kicks You Out of ITR-1: Filing Errors You Must Avoid
- Presumptive taxation does not bar Sec 68 additions: Mumbai ITAT
- Directorate of Public Grievances (DPG) to cover cases related to taxation
- Home Truths for Global Indians: Can NRIs Really Claim Capital Gains Exemptions under Sections 54 & 54F?
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT){kind=link}
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Slide3-11.jpg){kind=link}