Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT
Assessment order quashed as the notice issued under Section 148A(b) provided a response time of less than 7 days –…
Mukesh J. Ruparel v. ITO
Recent Posts
- Revision u/s 264 – PCIT bound to follow ITAT Special Bench: Tax on Deemed STCG u/s 50 at LTCG rate u/s 112
- Updated Return 2.0: From Correction Tool to Compliance Settlement Framework
- ROC Bengaluru Imposes Penalty for Approving Share Transfer in Physical Form
- Budget 2026: No deduction of interest in case of dividend income
- AI vs. Tax Evasion: The Success of NUDGE:
- No Permanent Establishment In India, Booking. com’s ₹3,960 Cr Commission Not Taxable: ITAT
- Making March Meaningful – Because 31st March Doesn’t Come with an Extension!
- Updated Return Allowed Even After Reassessment Notice – A Fresh Compliance Window under Finance Bill 2026
- Advance Tax under the Income Tax Act, 2025: Who Must Pay, Instalment Dates, and Interest Implications
- Compliance Calendar for March’2026
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT){kind=link}
 provided a response time of less than 7 days – Bengaluru ITAT&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Slide3-11.jpg){kind=link}