Revision order U/S 263 has to be passed and not necessarily served within the period of 2 years: Supreme Court.
0
Revision order U/S 263 has to be passed and not necessarily served within the period of 2 years: Supreme Court.…
Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed
Recent Posts
- Delay in filing Form 67 is a procedural lapse that does not affect the substantive right to claim FTC: ITAT
- GST Advisory: Reporting Differences in Tables 8A & 8C for FY 23-24
- ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ผ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ด๐ป ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐
- Will the notice sent by the wrong officer invalidate the assessment proceeding?
- Rs. 175 crore GST illegal Scam – HC verdict to release the Tax officer as there are procedural violations that render his detention null & void
- Inadmissible credit utilized is output tax unpaid or credit liable to reversal or both?
- Mere surrender of income would not absolve the assessee from the levy of penalty until and unless the mandatory provisions of Section 271AAA(2) has not been complied.
- Final Assessment orders quashed by Mumbai ITAT as it was passed without issue of the draft assessment orders under Section 144C
- An overview of the GST Circular No.239/33/2024-GST Dated 4th December 2024
- Notice issued with a delay of 2 Minutes: Reassessment Proceeding quashed by Delhi HC
