The use of word “May” in section 68 should be distinguished from the word “Shall”
0
The use of word “May” in section 68 should be distinguished from the word “Shall” Supreme court in the case…
may and shall
Recent Posts
- No penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) when Assessment Completed u/s 143(3)
- Set-Off of STT-Paid Losses Against 30% STCG is Allowed: ITAT Mumbai
- What you should do after income tax department has approached ITAT against favourable order of CIT (a)
- Can You Have Your Exemption and Carry Forward Losses Too? A 54F Story
- Southern Europe’s Banking Evolution: The Banco Novo Chapter
- BlackRock’s Transformation: Larry Fink’s Ambitious Roadmap to Innovation
- Source of source in respect of loans not required to be proved under section 68 of the ITA as it stood prior to 01.04.2023
- Guidelines for Compulsory Selection of Returns for Complete Serutiny during the Financial Year 202-26-procedure for compulsory selection in such case
- Disallowance of delayed employee contributions to EPF/ESI U/s 36(1)(va) not valid if made by CPC U/s 143(1)(a) as the issue was debatable at that point of time: Chhattisgarh High Court
- Debunking Credit Score Myths: Separating Fact from Fiction
