Just 3 Days time to file its response to the notice u/s 148A(b) results in grave prejudice to the Assessee: Delhi High Court
0
Just 3 Days time to file its response to the notice u/s 148A(b) results in grave prejudice to the Assessee:…
Just 3 Days
Recent Posts
- Mumbai ITAT upholds Taxpayer’s right to legitimate tax planning
- Benefit of cost inflation index is available even in respect of foreign assets.
- Grant of sanction by the appropriate authority is a precondition for AO to assume valid jurisdiction for issue of 148 notice: Mumbai ITAT
- NRI Landlords Can Consider This ‘Tax Hack’ to Resolve Money Stuck in TDS Deducted by Tenants
- Approval not obtained from PCIT as required under the new provisions – Reassessment notice declared invalid and assessment stood nullified: Mumbai ITAT
- Re-assessment notice issued U/s 148 being barred by limitation under the new provisions of section 149(1) is liable to be quashed and set aside.
- 10 year limit applies only prospectively, meaning it does not apply retroactively to assessment years where the old six-year limit has already expired: Delhi HC
- Delay in filing Form 67 is a procedural lapse that does not affect the substantive right to claim FTC: ITAT
- Delay in filing Form 67 is a procedural lapse that does not affect the substantive right to claim FTC: ITAT
- GST Advisory: Reporting Differences in Tables 8A & 8C for FY 23-24
 results in grave prejudice to the Assessee: Delhi High Court){kind=link}
 results in grave prejudice to the Assessee: Delhi High Court&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/nm-2.jpg){kind=link}