Jaipur Tax Bar Association filed PIL for limitations of the various litigations and compliances in GST and VAT Act

Recent Posts

• Notice u/s 148 served on the old email-id of the Assessee or wrong address is invalid
• Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 does not apply to assessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
• Stock in trade cannot be subject matter of addition u/s 56(2)(viia) as it is outside the meaning of the word ‘property’ as provided in clause (vii) : Mumbai ITAT 
• CIT(A) is duty bound to follow his predecessors order on similar issue decided in another case: Mumbai ITAT
• PMLA accused has a right to get copies of material not even relied on by ED: SC
• No addition on ESI PF issue permissible under section 143(1) prior to Checkmate Judgement: Chhattisgarh HC
• Once the business receipts are accepted, no separate addition under Section 68 survives: ITAT Mumbai.
• Notice issued without complying with the CBDT instruction specifying the format for such notices is invalid
• ITAT Cancels Reopening for AY 2015–16 as Income Was Below ₹50 Lakh and Notice Issued Beyond 3-Year Limit
• The approval U/s 153D must reflect material, findings and reasoning to show that the higher authority has applied his mind before granting approval: Mumbai ITAT.