Inverted Duty Structure: Gujarat High Court decision in favor of Assessee – Rule 89(5) is ultra vires section 54(3)
0
Inverted Duty Structure: Gujarat High Court decision in favor of Assessee – Rule 89(5) is ultra vires section 54(3) The…
Gujarat High Court in VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Recent Posts
- Notice issued with a delay of 2 Minutes: Reassessment Proceeding quashed by Delhi HC
- Voluntary disclosure of income does not absolve the assessee from penalties under Section 271(1)(c) and 271AAB: Pune ITAT.
- Benami Transactions: Demonetized currency retained monetary value for conversion within prescribed timelines and so it is “property” under the BPTA
- Section 249(4)(b) should not be rigidly when no ITR is filed & where the entire income assessed is disputed: ITAT Agra
- Whether negative blocking of credit ledger is allowed via the CGST Act, 2017?
- Two distinct flats situated on separate floors and lacking structural or functional integration could not be treated as one residential unit: Delhi HC.
- Key CGST Rules regarding ITC reversal and apportionment – Rule 37, 39, 42 & 43.
- GST & MSME Compliance: A short overview of the Common Mistakes
- Some important issues in Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme:
- If the assessee has not disclosed details of a foreign bank account & does not provide other details on requested by AO, the Department is justified in making the Estimate: Delhi HC
 is ultra vires section 54(3)){kind=link}
 is ultra vires section 54(3)&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r.jpg){kind=link}