Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty
Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty Delhi High…
Delhi HC quashes
Recent Posts
- Wife Seeking Husband’s ITR under RTI? Karnataka HC Draws a Clear Line
- Section 292BC: A Game-Changer to Neutralise Technical Defects in Tax Approvals
- Section 221 Penalty: Time Limit, Mandatory Order & Approval Requirement Explained
- BSNL VRS Compensation Held Fully Exempt – ITAT Pune Treats It as Retrenchment u/s 10(10B)
- Unsigned ‘Dumb Document’ Not Incriminating Material – 153C Proceedings Quashed
- Section 221 Penalty: When Delay in Tax Payment Becomes Costly
- 10% Deposit for Stay of Demand in Budget 2026 – Full Analysis, Applicability & Strategy
- Is Section 292BC the Final Nail in the Coffin for Technical Challenges to Assessments?
- When 3 Days Delay Travels to ITAT: The Curious Case of Casual Dismissals by CIT(A)
- Budget 2026 received President Assent: Key Personal Tax Changes Every Investor Must Act On
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty){kind=link}
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Presentation1-1.jpg){kind=link}