Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty
0
Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty Delhi High…
Delhi HC quashes
Recent Posts
- Telangana High Court upholds State wise GST Payments on works contract
- GST & MSME Compliance: A short overview of the Common Mistakes
- Tax Implications of Receiving Property in Exchange for Relinquishing Tenancy Rights
- ITAT Mumbai case on ‘penny stocks’ where there is no evidence of wrongdoing by assessee and all relevant documents are produced:
- CBDT Relieves Diplomatic Missions and UN Agencies from IT Section 194N Tax Provisions:
- Amendment to Circular No. 31/05/2018-GST, dated 9th February, 2018 on ‘Proper officer under sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017’
- Whether the scope of assessment U/s 153A could be broadened U/s 263 to include a re-calculation of LTCG pursuant to section 50C in cases where the original assessments remained unabated?
- Penalty of Rs.61.9 lakh for Non-filing of annual returns and annual financial statements in violation of Sec. 92(4) & Sec. 137(1) of the Companies Act by ROC, Tamilnadu
- Addition in the hands of Assessee in respect of account belonging to other: ITAT Agra deleted the addition after condoning delay of 174 days
- Compliance Calendar for Dec’2024
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty){kind=link}
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Presentation1-1.jpg){kind=link}