Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty
Failure to specify the limb of section 270A(9) for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty Delhi High…
Delhi HC quashes
Recent Posts
- Both JAO and FAO have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under section 148
- Condonation of Delay under Section 119(2)(b) – CBDT Circular Cannot Override Substantive Right to Refund: HC
- Taxation of Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) in the Context of the New Income Tax Act, 2025:
- Madras High Court Quashes Reassessment as Time-Barred and Without Jurisdiction:
- How Nagpur’s Tax Drive Signals a Nationwide Shift in Transparency
- Understanding Tax Exemption and TDS Issues on Land Acquisition Compensation
- Regulatory Exposure of High-Net-Worth Families under the Black Money Law:
- MSME Lifeline – New Credit Scheme to Counter 50% US Tariffs
- Bombay High Court Rules Assessee Cannot Be Penalized for Chartered Accountant’s Belated Advice in Tax Filing
- How Every Citizen Became a Tax Collector
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty){kind=link}
 for penalty – Delhi High Court quashed the penalty&description=&image=https://thetaxtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Presentation1-1.jpg){kind=link}