When the income had arisen, the corresponding expenditure, even if is to be incurred subsequently, is to be allowed
When the income had arisen, the corresponding expenditure, even if is to be incurred subsequently, is to be allowed Diamond…
Deduction to the developer
Recent Posts
- Gujarat High Court Clarifies the Law on Reassessment vs Search Assessments: Section 147 Cannot Bypass Section 153C
- Limited Scrutiny Means Limited Powers: ITAT Delhi Quashes Section 263 Revision in Harun Ali vs Pr. CIT
- No Addition under Section 69A on Repayment of Loan Already Accepted as Genuine: Key Ruling of ITAT Delhi
- Income-tax Act, 2025: Why the Change May Be More in Perception Than in Policy
- Income-tax Act, 2025 and Unexplained Income: Old Sections 68 to 69D vs New Law – Change in Substance or Just Structure?
- AI Based unverified Submission – Bombay High court imposes costs – A wake-up call for professionals
- The Dangerous Habit of Ignoring Income Tax Emails and SMS – And How It Quietly Backfires
- Capital Gain Exemption under Section 54 Available Even When New House Is Purchased with Housing Loan – ITAT Kolkata in Amit Parekh Case
- When “Irrevocable” Becomes a New Roadblock for charitable trust: An Unnecessary Hurdle for Charitable Trusts
- Delay in Filing Form 10B is Procedural – Substantive Exemption under Section 11 Cannot Be Denied on Technical Grounds
