Issuance of Notice by JAO & not FAO is invalid as an act which is done by an authority contrary to the provisions of the statue causes prejudice to assessee: Bombay HC  

Whether Section 5 of limitation Act applies to CGST Cases?

Modified return in the case of business reorganisation: An Overview

GSTN to ensure prompt credit & debit entries in real time : Allahabad HC

Reassessment Proceeding: Short Overview of the Bombay High Court in Hexaware Technologies Limited v. ACIT

GST Rate & HSN Code for Watches & clocks

Whether cash can be seized by the GST Department?

Compliance Calendar for May’ 2024

Guidelines for compulsory selection of returns for Complete scrutiny for FY 2024-25

Notice issued U/s 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) & not by Faceless Assessing Officer is invalid and bad in law: Bombay HC

Monetary limit fixed for assessment to be done by ACIT won’t preclude jurisdictional AO to initiate reassessment

The jurisdiction of a High Court is not dependent on the location of the ITAT as one Bench of may exercises jurisdiction over other states.

NEW TAX REGIME: NO TAX ON INCOME OF RS. 7 LAKH* [* Terms & Condition Apply]

Mode & Way to form HUF

Validity of assessment framed u/s 143(3) vis a vis issuance of notice U/s 143(2) by non- jurisdictional ITO

Addition of Rs.344.55 Cr during assessment proceeding with less than 72 Hours to reply to SCN: Assessment quashed by Bombay HC for de-novo consideration by AO.

Hon’ble SC upheld strict adherence to the Time Limit for Refunds

Filing of Form MSME- 1