Notice issued U/s 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) & not by Faceless Assessing Officer is invalid and bad in law: Bombay HC
Monetary limit fixed for assessment to be done by ACIT won’t preclude jurisdictional AO to initiate reassessment
The jurisdiction of a High Court is not dependent on the location of the ITAT as one Bench of may exercises jurisdiction over other states.
Validity of assessment framed u/s 143(3) vis a vis issuance of notice U/s 143(2) by non- jurisdictional ITO
Addition of Rs.344.55 Cr during assessment proceeding with less than 72 Hours to reply to SCN: Assessment quashed by Bombay HC for de-novo consideration by AO.
Excessive or unreasonable salary, is a sine qua non in invoking the provision of Sec 40A(2)(b): ITAT Ahmedabad
HC permitted assessee to submit representation before concerned GST Authority for rectifying inadvertently displayed TDS number