• Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax
    • Latest Update
      • Circular
      • IT Judgement
      • Notification
      • Press Release
    • Article
      • salary
      • House propery
      • Business/Profession
      • Capital Gain
      • Other Source Of Income
      • Assessment
      • Tax Planning
  • GST
    • GST Act 2016
      • CGST Acts
    • GST Rules 2016
      • CGST Rules
      • SGST Rules
      • IGST Rules
    • GST Articles
      • Time Of Supply
      • Place Of Supply
      • Other GST Article
    • GST Judgement
  • News & Articles
    • Company Law
    • Other News
      • News
      • DTAA
      • Head Of Income
      • Interesting Income Tax
      • Miscellaneous
  • CA/CS/CMA Firms
  • New Home
  • Login
Sum paid for maintenance of medical equipments is liable for sec. 194C TDS & not 194J TDS

Sum paid for maintenance of medical equipments is liable for sec. 194C TDS & not 194J TDS

Important : Restricting the scope of LLP activities

Important : Restricting the scope of LLP activities

Raipur : Jewellery Businessmen filed complain against Income Tax Officer

Raipur : Jewellery Businessmen filed complain against Income Tax Officer

Rectification petition filed beyond the time limit set out in s. 254(2) is liable to be dismissed being time barred.

Rectification petition filed beyond the time limit set out in s. 254(2) is liable to be dismissed being time barred.

Assumption of revisional jurisdiction by CIT u/s 263 without pointing out exact error committed by AO and directed AO to make detailed and roving enquires is unsustainable in law.

Assumption of revisional jurisdiction by CIT u/s 263 without pointing out exact error committed by AO and directed AO to make detailed and roving enquires is unsustainable in law.

Whether GST paid along with Insurance premium is also eligible for deduction u/s 80C & 80D ?

Whether GST paid along with Insurance premium is also eligible for deduction u/s 80C & 80D ?

Bogus Share Premium: No reason to interfere. SLP dismissed by SC

Bogus Share Premium: No reason to interfere. SLP dismissed by SC

CBDT extends due date for filing of report in respect of International group of subsidiaries of USA residents

CBDT extends due date for filing of report in respect of International group of subsidiaries of USA residents

New functionality in GST Portal

New functionality in GST Portal

Bank audit Special - RBI Enforcement on Statutory Auditors

Bank audit Special – RBI Enforcement on Statutory Auditors

Nice representation by ICSI on dormant companies, Details of Auditor filing.

Nice representation by ICSI on dormant companies, Details of Auditor filing.

GSTR- 1 & GSTR -7 returns date Extended.

Lucknow: 2100 sale deeds done without TDS – Recovery proceeding to be commenced

Deemed dividend could only have been assessed in the hands of a person who was shareholder of lender company

Beneficial Judgement- Deemed dividend could only have been assessed in the hands of a person who was shareholder of lender company

[2019] 104 taxmann.com 59 (Bombay) IT : Once Commissioner (Appeals) had passed order after verification of merit of claim of expenditure and depreciation, Tribunal was not right in law in reversing said conclusion without examining its correctness Section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Appellate Tribunal - Orders of (Non-speaking orders) - Assessment year 2006-07 - Assessing Officer passed an order of reassessment, in which, additions were made by disallowing assessee-company's claim of expenditure as well as claim of depreciation - On appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) allowed both claims after verifying merit of claims - Commissioner (Appeals) found that in another year in assessee's own case Tribunal allowed depreciation on ground that assets were ready to use though assessee could not commence commercial production due to lack of working capital - Commissioner (Appeals) also found that Assessing Officer had changed its opinion from earlier Assessing Officer and disallowed impugned amounts - Whether Tribunal was not right in law in merely reversing order of Commissioner (Appeals) without any discussion or even any conclusion justifying of additions made by Assessing Officer - Held, yes Shirpur Gold Refinery Ltd.

ITAT couldn’t reverse order of CIT(A) without examining correctness of additions made by AO

Sum received by partner on retirement from firm isn't chargeable to tax in hands of partner

Sum received by partner on retirement from firm isn’t chargeable to tax in hands of partner

Reassessment notice held bad in law as it was sanctioned by CIT on ground which was different from the ground of AO

Reassessment notice held bad in law as it was sanctioned by CIT on ground which was different from the ground of AO

Beware : Once the cash was deposited into bank account of assessee, primary onus was on assessee to prove how the said cash was sourced to avoid as unexplained amount

Beware : Once the cash was deposited into bank account of assessee, primary onus was on assessee to prove how the said cash was sourced to avoid as unexplained amount

Previous 1 … 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 … 741 Next

This is an online news portal for tax news, updates, articles, judgments, Circulars, Notification and orders with regards to Indian Taxation Laws. ‘Simplifying the TAX & creating awareness about tax laws is the main motto of the Team theTAXTALK.

Recent Posts

  • CIT(A) Cannot Tell AO to Reopen Another Assessment Year
  • DVO Valuation and 10% Tolerance Band: Can the Income Tax Department Tax a Difference in Property Value after DVO report?
  • Section 87A Rebate on STCG under Section 111A – Ready-to-Use Application before the Assessing Officer
  • When CPC Says “NO” to Rebate under Section 87A – Nagpur ITAT Says, Yes!
  • Forgotten Foreign Bank Account? ₹ 5 Lakh Shares? A New Tax Window Has Opened!

Sign Up to New letter

Subscribe to our newsletter and get the latest updates