Requirement to deposit 20% of the disputed demand as per the said CBDT Circular is directory in nature and not mandatory.
Madras HC Quashes TVS Reassessment Notice – JAO Has No Jurisdiction, Only Faceless AO Can Issue 148A Notices, Holds Court
Sales tax incentives granted under state schemes for setting up industries in backward areas constitute capital receipts & so not taxable: Bombay HC
No discrepancies in sales, Books of accounts also not rejected – No addition towards cash deposit sustainable
Supreme Court Dismisses SLP in JAO–FAO Jurisdiction Case: Revenue Seeks Revival Amidst 700+ Similar Matters
No disallowance under Section 143(1)(a) can be made towards delayed ESI and EPF contributions as the issue was highly debatable
Entire amount of bogus purchases cannot be disallowed – ITAT Ahmadabad distinguishes Bombay HC decision
JAO Vs. FAO Controversy: Bombay HC again followed Hexaware Technology decision – Rejected department contention that it is pending before Supreme Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order: Right to Video Conferencing During Tax Proceedings Upheld
Mere Non-Response to Section 133(6) Notices Cannot Justify Addition: A Landmark Ruling by ITAT Mumbai
Issuance of notice under section 148 in faceless manner is mandatory: SLP filed by Income Tax Department dismissed by SC
Delhi High Court on Reassessment Proceedings: AO Cannot Review Own 148A(d) Order; Time-Bar under Section 149 Applies
CBDT issues Circular to provide relief in case of TDS demands on account of Non Linkage of PAN – Aadhar.
If order under section 263 quashed by ITAT, assessment done pursuant to section 263 doesn’t not survive. Filing of appeal by department at HC do not change the position
