CBDT Circular issued under section 119 of the IT Act is binding on the IT Authorities. AO’s jurisdiction is limited to the issue identified by the CASS in case of ‘Limited Scrutiny’ cases
Failure to produce reconciliation difference in creditor’s account is liable for addition as undisclosed income u/s 68
Allowability of deduction if payments were not supported by the bills raised and only self-made vouchers were maintained by assessee.
Validity of Penalty under section 271(1)(b) if Assessee did not comply with notice under section 142(1) but Assessment order was passed under section 143(3), and not under section 144
If no cash is involved in the transactions and transactions is done by way of journal entries then AO is not justified in making addition u/s 68
Validity of Assessment if ‘limited scrutiny’ shifted to ‘complete scrutiny’ without Prior approval of Principal Commissioner/Commissioner
Landmark Judgment: Validity of Addition under section 68 towards Cash deposits in bank account if Assessee is not required to maintain books of account under section 44AD
Expenditure incurred by the assessee towards replacement of machinery with new machinery constitutes a capital expenditure.