Serious processing error at CPC, Bengaluru: Numerous erroneous message of proposed adjustment U/s 143(1)(a) forwarded
GST & Anti Fraud Department Cannot Issue Notices to Lawyers of Alleged Tax Evaders : Calcutta High Court
When the substantive law confers a benefit on the assessee under a statute, it cannot be taken away by the adjudicatory authority on mere technicalities.
Even if the Order has not been served electronically on the Portal, the Limitation Period for felling an Appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 will start from the date of service of the Order manually : Gujarat HC
5% GST for Un-Fried Extruded Snack Pellets, 18% for Ready –To-Eat variants: CBIC Circular No 200/12/2023
Advisory for applicants where GST Registration application marked for Biometric-based Aadhaar Authentication
Assessing authorities are bound to compute the correct income, and merely for a procedural lapse on technicalities, the assessee should not be compelled to pay more taxes than what is due from him
Assessee having failed to claim exemption under s. 54F, could claim the same by way of revision under s. 264 and the revisionary authority is bound to consider the same
Nostro Account maintenance charges are not Interest U/S 2(28A)ITO v. The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd
GSTN Advisory for applicants where GST Registration application marked for Biometric-based Aadhaar Authentication
Patna High Court tightens the IT Cnorms- Claims of IT by purchasing dealer subjected to strict rigors of payment of tax by selling dealers
Revisionary jurisdiction by the Pr. CIT solely based on the valuation officer’s report is not justified: Chennai ITAT
Responsibility of Purchaser is limited to the extent of verifying GST Registrstion of the Supplier on GST Portal – Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court
