• Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax
    • Latest Update
      • Circular
      • IT Judgement
      • Notification
      • Press Release
    • Article
      • salary
      • House propery
      • Business/Profession
      • Capital Gain
      • Other Source Of Income
      • Assessment
      • Tax Planning
  • GST
    • GST Act 2016
      • CGST Acts
    • GST Rules 2016
      • CGST Rules
      • SGST Rules
      • IGST Rules
    • GST Articles
      • Time Of Supply
      • Place Of Supply
      • Other GST Article
    • GST Judgement
  • News & Articles
    • Company Law
    • Other News
      • News
      • DTAA
      • Head Of Income
      • Interesting Income Tax
      • Miscellaneous
  • CA/CS/CMA Firms
  • New Home
  • Login

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Bonafide Mistake

8th January 2020




Loading

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Bonafide Mistake

Harish Kumar (HUF) v. Dy. CIT
Decision:    In assessee’s favour.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) Concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars Leviability Bona fide mistake
Facts:
Assessee filed revised computation of income wherein long-term capital gain (LTCG) was increased due to disallowance under section 94(7). Accordingly, AO levied penalty under section 271(1)(c) on account of furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Assessee’s case was that there was an inadvertent clerical error committed by Chartered Accountant and on the advice of Senior Chartered Accountant. Assessee filed revised computation voluntarily.
Held:
As evident assessee had not filed any false claim and the mistake occurred due to inadvertent bona fide error in the claim due to one entry by accounts staff posted at wrong date due to huge voluminous transactions and dividend coupons for dividend from same security punched at one voucher. Assessee had paid voluntary taxes on disallowance under section 94(7) and AO had completed assessment on the basis of details furnished by assessee, hence, under the circumstances assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income and AO was accordingly not justified in levying penalty under section 271(1)(c).

 




8th January 2020

This is an online news portal for tax news, updates, articles, judgments, Circulars, Notification and orders with regards to Indian Taxation Laws. ‘Simplifying the TAX & creating awareness about tax laws is the main motto of the Team theTAXTALK.

Recent Posts

  • Section 54F Relief Available Even for Extension of an Existing House? Bangalore ITAT Says Yes
  • Can Section 263 Be Invoked When There Is No Tax Loss to the Revenue? ITAT Kolkata Reiterates the Twin Conditions of Revision
  • Legal Heir Is Not Always the Legal Representative: ITAT Agra Quashes Assessment Passed Without Proper Compliance Under Section 159
  • Section 56(2)(x): Can Stamp Duty Value on Registration Date Trigger Tax Even When the Property Deal Was Finalised Years Earlier? ITAT Ahmedabad Says No
  • Sold Multiple Houses in the Same Year? ITAT Bangalore Rules Section 54 Exemption Is Available for Each House Separately

Sign Up to New letter

Subscribe to our newsletter and get the latest updates