Section 148A(d) Order Cannot Be Passed Without a Valid Sanction Under Section 151: Bombay HC

 

Umang Mahendra Shah Versus Union of India & Ors (WP 2914 of 2024)

 

Facts:

1.  The notice issued by the respondent department u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been contested by the taxpayer. The assessment year was 2016–17. Applicant indeed contested the notice that is on the stage of the notice issued under Section 148A(b) and an order passed by the respondent department on notice under the provisions of Section 148A(d).

 

2.  It was argued by the taxpayer that the order passed through the assessing officer u/s 148A(d), which sets the required approval to pass the order u/s 148A(d) was granted by the Principal CIT, Mumbai, via a letter or order sheet entry dated August 29, 2022, by the provisions of Section 151(i) of the Income Tax Act, read with paragraph 6.2(ii) of Instruction 01 of 2022 issued by the CBDT.

 

3.  The sanction is required to have been received under clause (ii) of Section 151, which can be through the Chief Commissioner or Director General, if more than 3 years have passed from the termination of the relevant assessment year, which is assessment year 2016–17.

 

Hon Bombay HC held as below:

1.  A sanction for passing an order u/s 148A(d) was directed to be obtained under clause (ii) of Section 151 as more than 3 years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year for the proceedings to be adopted u/s 148A and subsequently under section 148 of the Act. However, the sanction was obtained under clause (i) of Section 151.

 

2.  If an order is passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act in the lack of an appropriate sanction as per the provisions of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, the order and the resulting notice u/s 148 shall need to be declared illegal.

The copy of the order is as under:

umang-mahendra-shah-550451