GST: Failure to generate e-way bill on time without having any poyential financial implications is a mere technical errors & should not be a ground for imposition of penalties.
Allahabad High court recently has held that i๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฏ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐ฑ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ. ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ ๐-๐ฐ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ is a m๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐ก๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ & ย ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ
The key observations were as under:
1. Only technical errors under tax laws without any financial implications must not be the foundation for the imposition of penalties
2.ย Mere technical errors, without having any potential financial implications, should not be the grounds for the imposition of penalties. The underlying philosophy is to maintain a fair and just tax system, where penalties are proportionate to the gravity of the offense. In taxation, the imposition of penalty serves as a critical measure to ensure compliance with tax laws and regulations.
3.ย The Court sees that there was no tax evasion intent on the part of the applicant since all details with a vehicle transporting information of the goods were mentioned in the tax invoices carrying the goods.
4.ย The department had erred in holding that intent to evade the tax was a critical element under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 but was done away withย under GST laws, the court ruled.
5.ย As per the court, establishing the tax evasion intention of the paramount acknowledgment in the tax regime to keep its virtue
6.ย Case Reference: M/S Falguni Steels v. State Of U.P. And Others WRIT TAX No. โ 146 of 2023 (Allahabad HC) Neutral Citation No. – 2024:AHC:11990