Validity of re-assessment Notice u/s 148 issued on or after 1-4-2021 where due process under section 148A was not followed
It was submitted that on the date i.e. on 30-6-2021 when the notice under section 148 was issued, the power to issue the notice was preceded with a new provision of law and thereby section 148 is to read with section 148A. It was submitted that as per the Finance Act, 2021, which was published in the Gazette on 28-3-2021, section 2 to 88 was notified to come into force on 1-4-2021 and accordingly the new section 148A was inserted which prescribed that before issuing the notice under section 148, the AO was bound to conduct an enquiry giving an opportunity of hearing to the assessee with the prior approval of specified authority and show cause notice in detail was necessary specifying particular date for hearing. It was submitted that since the operation of section 148A came into being on 1-4-2021, as such, the notice issued to the petitioner on 30-6-2021 under section 148, without following the procedure under section 148A without giving an opportunity of hearing would be illegal and contrary to the provisions of section 148A and it cannot be sustained. It was further submitted that the respondents though have placed reliance on certain notification of Ministry of Finance but when the law has been enacted by the Parliament then in such case the notification issued by the Ministry of Finance would not over ride even to extend the period of operation of section of the old Act of section 148. It was stated section 148A came in between which requires certain obligation to be performed by the AO, therefore without giving any opportunity of hearing the notice under section148 would be alleged. It was finally submitted that the impugned notice was illegal and was liable to be quashed.
It is held that : Reading of the notification would show that it was issued in exercise of power conferred under the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and time for issuance of notice under section 148, the end date was initially extended up till on 30-4-2021 and subsequently again by Notification, dated 27-4-2021 the time limit of 30-4-2021 was further extended up till 30th day of June, 2021. By effect of such notification, the individual identity of section 148, which was prevailing prior to amendment and insertion of section 148A was insulated and saved up till 30-6-2021.The pandemic and lock down prevailed all over India. The people could not file their return or comply with the various mandate of Income Tax Act. Considering such situation for the benefit of the assessee and to facilitate the individual to come out of woods the time limit framed under Income Tax Act was extended. Likewise certain right which was reserved in favour of the Income Tax Department was also preserved and was extended at parity. Consequently the provisions of section 148 which was prevailing prior to the amendment of Finance Act, 2021 was also extended. Here in this case, the power to issue notice under section 148 which was prior to the amendment was also saved and the time was extended. In a result, the notice issued on 30-6-2021 would also be saved.
Short Overview Reading of both the Notification, dated 31-3-2021 and 27-4-2021 whereby the application of section 148, which was originally existing before the amendment was deferred meaning thereby the reassessment mechanism as prevalent prior to 31-3-2021 was saved by the notification. The notification was issued by the Ministry of Finance considering the fact of lock down all over India. It can be always be assumed that the deferment of the application of section 148A was done in a control way. It was settled proposition that any modification of the Executives implies certain amount of discretion and to be exercised with the aid of the legislative policy of the Act and cannot travel beyond it and run counter to it or certainly change the essential features, the identity, structure or the policy of the Act. Therefore, this legislative delegation which was exercised by the Central Government by notification to uphold the mechanism as prevailed prior to March, 2021 is not in conflict with any Act and notification by executive, i.e., Ministry of Finance would be the part of legislative function.
Applied: A.K. Roy v. Union of India AIR 1982 SC 710
Decision: Against the assessee.
IN THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT AT BILASPUR BENCH
GOUTAM BHADURI, J.
Palak Khatuja v. UOI
W.P. (T) Nos. 147, 148 & 149 of 2021
23 August, 2021
Petitioners by: N. Naha Roy, Advocate
Respondents by: Amit Choudhary with Naushina Ali, Advocates
ORDER ON BOARD