Coaching Class or Hospital by a private limited company? Whether it’s a Business vs Profession? – CA Naresh Jakhotia



Coaching Class or Hospital by a private limited company? Whether it’s a Business vs Profession  CA Naresh Jakhotia



I am running a commercial coaching class. Whether I will be required to get the books of accounts audited if my gross receipts exceed Rs. 50 Lakh?


  1. The limit of professionals is Rs. 5 Lakh whereas it is Rs. 1 Cr or 2 Cr or Rs. 5 Cr in case of Business. Now, the real question is whether you are engaged in the business or profession.


  1. Section 2(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 gives an inclusive definition of the term “Business”. The word “profession” & “vocation” have not been defined in the Act while as per section 2(36) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, “profession” includes vocation.


  1. The word “vocation” is a word of wider import than the word ‘profession”.


  1.  There are differences between the meaning of words “business” & “profession” in various English dictionaries. According to the Shorter Oxford Dictionary, “business” includes a state occupation, profession or trade; profession in a wide sense means any calling or occupation by which a person habitually earns his living. Even so, “trade” is explained as the practice of some occupation, business or profession habitually carried on. In the advanced learner’s dictionary of current English printed at the Oxford University Press the word “Profession” has been meant (among other meanings) as the occupation especially one requiring advanced education and special training (e.g. the law, architecture, medicine, the Church, often called the learned profession). The word “vocation” has been given the meaning (among other meanings) as a certain kind of work (esp. social or religious).


  1. The words “business” and “vocation” are not synonymous, Upon a proper construction of the words “business” and “vocation” in the context of the Indian Income-tax Act, there must be some real, substantive and systematic course of business or conduct before it can be said that a business or vocation exists the profits of which are taxable as such under the Act as held in Upper India Chamber of Commerce, Cawnpore vs. CIT (1947) 15 ITR 263 (All).


  1. In the Income Tax Act -1961, it may be noted that the professions is discussed in  Rule 6F of the I.T. Rules, 1962 as uder:
  2. Architectural
  3. Accountancy
  4. Authorised representative
  5. Engineering
  6.   Film Artist
  7. Interior Decoration
  8. Legal
  9. Medical
  10. Technical Consultancy.

“Film artist” means any person engaged in his professional capacity                            in the production of a cinematograph film whether produced by him                                or by any other person, as—

(i)   an actor,

(ii)   a cameraman;

(iii)   a director, including an assistant director;

(iv)    a music director, including an assistant music director;

(v)    an art director, including an assistant art director;

(vi)   a dance director, including an assistant dance director;

(vii)   an editor;

(viii)   a singer;

(ix)   a lyricist;

(x)   a story writer;

(xi)   a screen-play writer;

(xii)   a dialogue writer; and

(xiii)  a dress designer.


  1. However, the definition of profession as discussed above is for the purpose of maintenance of book of accounts only u/s 44AA. The said definition may not be automatically made applicable to the section 44AB without its specific inclusion in the section itself.


  1. In the absence of clear definition of ‘profession’ under the Income-tax Act for the purpose of section 44AB, whether an activity will fall under the term of “Business” or ‘Profession’ will depend upon the facts & circumstances of case in question and one has to necessarily refer to the judicial interpretation for the same. I am discussing some of the prouncements on the issue.


  1.  It was observed in P. Stanwill & Co. vs. CIT (supra) that a certain amount of skill and knowledge is required in every business; in a profession it is required in a larger degree though that may not be the sole criterion for judging whether a particular business is a profession or not.



  1. Supreme Court in Lakshminarayan Ram Gopal and Son Ltd. vs. Government of Hyderabad (1954) 25 ITR 449 at page 459 held:
    “The activities which constitute carrying on business need not necessarily consist of activities by way of trade, commerce or manufacture of activities in the exercise of a profession or vocation. They may even consist of rendering services to others which services may be of a variegated character.” 
  2. Even in the United Kingdom at one time, it was felt that if there was such an unison in the two, that is, business and profession, the income from each had to be separated by adopting an actual formula and dealt with as such and concessions granted. Such a doctrine of severability was noticed in Commissioner of Inland Revenue vs. Maxse (1919) 2 All ER 517 and Neild vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners (1948) 2 All ER 1071.
  3. At page No. 710 in Supreme Court in CIT vs. Manmohan Das (1966) 59 ITR 699 (SC) it is held that a profession involves occupation requiring purely intellectual or manual skill.


  1. Further, Supreme Court in State of Punjab & another vs. Bajaj Electricals Ltd. (1968) 70 ITR 730 (SC) has held that “Trade” in its primary meaning is the exchanging of goods for goods or goods for money; in its secondary meaning it is repeated activity in the nature of business carried on with a profit motive, the activity being manual or mercantile, as distinguished from the liberal arts or learned professions or agriculture.


  1. In William Esplen, Son & Swainston, Limited vs. Commissioners of Inland Revenue (1919) 2 KB 731 the same learned Judge quoted as under:

“It is of the essence of a profession that the profits should be dependent mainly upon the personal qualification of the person by whom it is carried on…………….”



  1. In routine conversation, everyone distinguishes the professions of Advocate, Architecture, Chartered Accountant, Doctor, Engineer from the business activities of manufacturing, trading, purchase, sale, commission agent, etc.


  1. The Allahabad High Court in P. Stanwill & Co. Vs. CIT (1952) 22 ITR 316 (All) observed that the main difference between ordinary commercial business and profession lies in the amount of knowledge or skill employed in carrying it on though that may not be the sole criterion. As it was pointed out by Rowlatt, J., inChristopher Barker & Sons vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners (1919) 2 KB 222.

    “every business man has to use skill and ability in the conduct of his business and therefore, those qualities are not distinguishing marks of a profession.”

    The learned Judge in attempting to point out the difference says:—“All professions are businesses, but all businesses are not professions, and it is only some businesses which are taken out of the operation of the section, namely, those are professions, the profits of which are dependent mainly upon personal qualifications and in which nil capital expenditure is required or only capital expenditure of a comparatively small amount.”



  1. Still, a person who is an expert & professional carries on any activity then can it be treated like a profession? Certainly, he can take advantage of a provision in the fiscal Act by claiming an allowance or rebate, and if such a claim carries a lighter burden of tax, then he has the right to take advantage of the same – Observed inDr. P. Vadamalaysn vs. CIT (1969) 74 ITR 94 (Mad)).


  1. Venkatarama Aiyar J.,speaking for the court in Mazagaon Dock Ltd. vs. CIT (1958) 34 ITR 368 at page 376 (SC), explained “business” as a word of wide import and in fiscal statutes it must be construed in a broad rather than a restricted sense.



  1. Scrutton, LJ, in Commissioners of Inland Revenue vs. Maxse (1919) 12 Tax Cas. 41 attempted, though with considerable diffidence, to define what is a “profession” and said:—

“I am very reluctant finally to propound a comprehensive definition.  A set of facts not present to the mind of the judicial propounded, and not raised in the case before him, may immediately arise to confounds his proposition. But it seems to me, as at present advised, that a ‘profession’ in the present use of language involves the idea of an occupation requiring either purely intellectual skill or if any manual skill, as in painting and sculpture, or surgery, skill controlled by the intellectual skill or if any manual skill, as in painting and sculpture, or surgery, skill controlled by the intellectual skill of the operator as distinguished from an occupation which is substantially the production, or sale, or arrangements for the production or sale of commodities. The line of demarcation may vary from time to time. The word ‘profession’ used to be confined to the three learned professions—the Church, Medicine and Law. It has now, I think, a wider meaning…………”



  1. Supreme Court in Narain Swadeshi Weaving Mills vs. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax (1954) 26 ITR 765 (SC), said that the word “business” connotes some real, substantial and systematic or organised course of activity or conduct with a set purpose.


  1. In considering the question whether the activity was a business activity or it was a hobby, would depend upon the dominant intention of the assessee and the actual activity carried on by the assessee (Mrs. Kamala Muthia vs. CIT (2003) 175 Taxation 581 (Mad.).


  1. Supreme Court in  Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd vs. CIT 2015 (5) TMI 46 (SC) has observed that merely an entry in the object clause showing a particular object would not be the determinative factor to arrive at an conclusion whether the income is to be treated as income from business and such a question would depend upon the circumstances of each case, viz., whether a particular business is letting or not. The judgment was rendered in the context of taxing the income under a particular head of income.



  1. It was observed by the Madras High Court in reference to section 2(13) in the case of Dr. P. Vadamalayan vs. CIT as referred above that the definition of ‘business’, being an inclusive definition and not being exhaustive, is indicative of extension and expansion and not restriction.



Also it was observed in Addl CIT vs. Ram Kripal Tripathi (1980) 125 ITR 408 (All) that the expression “profession” involves the idea of an occupation requiring purely intellectual skill or manual skill controlled by the intellectual skill of the operator, as distinguished from an occupation or business which is substantially the production or sale, or arrangements for the production or sale, of commodities. “Profession” is a word of wide import and includes “vocation” which is only a way of living and a person can have more than one vocation, and the vocation need not be for livelihood nor for making any income nor need it involves systematic and organised activity. It was observed in Dr. P. Vadamalayan vs. CIT (supra) at page 96) that the term “business” as used in the fiscal statute cannot ordinarily be understood in its etymological sense.





  1. Since, Income Tax Act has given an inclusive definition of the word “business”, it is  capable of wide application. Some activities by its very nature can be treated as business.
  2. What is covered in Rule 6F can undoubtedly recognized as “Profession” since the definition itself mentions it. The same can be comfortably applied for the purpose of section 44AB.
  3. For other activities, there is always going to be a litigation. One can reasonably argue on the basis of above discussion & presentation for other activities which could be in the nature of “profession”. However, if one intends to follow the conservative approach, I would suggest to adopt the view of “profession” as one which is elaborated in Rule 6F referred above.


For Tax & Corporate Law Updates on Mobile, we have created Telegram and Whatsapp Group with following Link:

Telegram Group at –


Whatsapp Group at


Income Tax Act on Your Mobile Now
Android Application
Income Tax Act – 1961 with Cost Inflation Index
and other tools on Mobile now at following link: