Trading in Sawn timber is liable for TCS u/s 206C as Forest Produce?

Loading

Trading in Sawn timber is liable for TCS u/s 206C as Forest Produce?

 

Trading in Sawn timber is liable for TCS u/s 206C as Forest Produce?

An important judgment has been delivered in the PCIT(TDS) Kolkata Vs Nirmal Kumar Kejriwal by the Calcutta High Court on 22nd July 2022 in applicability of TCS in the case of forest produce. The issue before HC was
“Whether trading in Sawn timber is liable for collection of tax at source u/s 206C of the Income-tax Act,1961?”

The court duly analysed the Difference between Logs and Sawn timber.

The decision correctly analysed the provisions of Section 206C and will be helpful in interpretation of the said section in various other related issues.

The Division bench of Calcutta High Court in this case was considering department’s appeal which challenged the relief granted by ITAT by holding that the trading in Sawn timber was not liable for collection of TCS u/s 206C of the Act which dealt with forest produce and sawn timber could not be said to be forest produce. The Hon’ble judges while dismissing the department’s appeal interalia relied on the decision of the Andhra Pradesh Forest Development corporation ltd Vs ACIT also referred to Calcutta high court decision in the case of Andaman and Nicobar Islands Forest and Plantation Development Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in (2006) 280 ITR 118 (Cal) wherein it was held that de-embarking and seasoning tree trunks and converting them into logs would amount to production of a new commercial article or thing within the meaning of Sections 32AB, 80HH and 80J of the Act. Thus, when conversion of logs into sawn timber amounted to manufacture, it was clear that Section 206C does not apply to sawn timber which only applied to forest produce and sawn timber could not be said to be forest produce.

The copy of the landmark order is as under:

Tax_Tds_Kolkata_vs_Nirmal_Kumar_Kejriwal_on_22_July_2022
Menu