Penny stock case: Mere furnishing of contract notes etc does not inspire any confidence

154
Penny stock case: Mere furnishing of contract notes etc does not inspire any confidence

Penny stock case: Mere furnishing of contract notes etc does not inspire any confidence

Rajkumar B. Agarwal vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Bogus Capital Gains From Penny Stocks:
The assessee completed paper-trail by producing contract notes for purchase and sale of shares. of PIL.
Mere furnishing of contract notes etc does not inspire any confidence in the light of facts. Test of human probability should be applied and apparent should be ignored to unearth the harsh reality (Sumati Dayal 214 ITR 801 (SC) & Durga Prasad More 82 ITR 540 (SC) applied)
The entire position which thus emerges is that PIL is a penny stock company, which fact got established from enquiries conducted by BSE and SEBI. Not only the DSP shares and Securities Ltd. and Galaxy Broking Ltd. were fined for manipulating the prices of shares of PIL, even the broker from whom the assessee allegedly purchased the shares was suspended and debarred from acting as a broker by SEBI and further the broker to whom such shares were sold, was also warned by SEBI for manipulating the prices of different shares during the relevant period. There is doubt that the assessee completed paper-trail by producing contract notes for the purchase and sale of shares of PIL. In our considered opinion, mere furnishing of contract notes etc. and more specifically when seen in the background of the above noted facts, does not inspire any confidence and cannot be a ground to delete an addition, which is otherwise made on the solid bedrock of detailed enquiries

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here